Tuesday, July 2, 2019

Theology 201 #7: The Dangers of Arminianism Part #1 Open Theism


Before the mountains were born Or You gave birth to the earth and the world, Even from everlasting to everlasting, You are God” (Ps. 90:2 NASB).
Over the past several months we have compared and contrasted Calvinism and Arminianism. If you will recall: Calvinism and Arminianism are two systems of theology that attempt to explain the relationship between God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility in the matter of salvation. This month we will consider a potential danger related to the Arminian view known as open theism.
Open theism began being taught within the past 20 years or so, and thankfully has very few adherents. It is a liberal view that resulted from taking certain Arminian teachings beyond what is commonly taught. One writer explained open theism in the following way. “Open Theism is the thesis that, because God loves us and desires that we freely choose to reciprocate His love, He has made His knowledge of, and plans for, the future conditional upon our actions. Though omniscient (all-knowing), God does not know what we will freely do in the future. Though omnipotent (all-powerful), He has chosen to invite us to freely collaborate with Him in governing and developing His creation, thereby also allowing us the freedom to thwart His hopes for us. God desires that each of us freely enter into a loving and dynamic personal relationship with Him, and He has therefore left it open to us to choose for or against His will” (https://www. iep.utm.edu/o-theism/).
There are a few things mentioned above that need careful consideration. First, let us consider possible proof texts that open theists use to support their position of God’s omniscience being limited. The open theists will argue, if God’s omniscience is not limited then how does one explain passages that stated that God repented? “And it repented the LORD that He had made man on the earth, and it grieved Him at His heart” (Gen. 6:6; see also the KJV of Ex. 32:14; 1 Sam. 15:11, 35; Jon. 3:10). 
Thus, the open theists argue, why would a perfectly all-knowing God need to repent, or even display emotions of surprise (Mark 6:6), or mourning over the death of a friend named Lazarus that God the Son, Jesus would raise from the dead (John 11:35)? Bruce Ware does a good job of explaining what it means when God is said to repent. “...it indicates His real experience, in historically unfolding relationships with people, of changed dispositions or emotions in relation to some changed human situation. Just because God knows in advance that some event will occur, this does not preclude God from experiencing appropriate emotions and expressing appropriate reactions when it actually happens” (God’s Lesser Glory: The Diminished God of Open Theism, p. 91). This is very similar to how we express emotions. For example, when a loved one has a terminal illness, the doctors inform us that our loved one only has a very limited amount of time left. Thus, we know that they are going to be passing from this life soon, so their death is not a surprise to us. However, we still mourn over their passing when it comes. God is exactly like that. He knows all that will ever take place, yet He still displays emotions that are appropriate for each situation when it occurs.
In the case of when God is said to repent, it is important to note that it indicates that God is aware that the situation has changed. And therefore, He desires to act in a way fitting to this change.
At this point in this lesson, it would be good to consider things about God which never change, and things that do. God's character never changes. He is all-powerful. He is always present everywhere. He knows everything. He is Sovereign—thus, always in charge. He is always holy, righteous, just, loving, merciful and faithful. These are the things that are a part of God’s unchanging nature (Mal. 3:6; Heb. 13:8).
Additionally, God’s eternal purpose and plan do not change, despite our contingent responses to them. “The LORD foils the plans of the nations; he thwarts the purposes of the peoples. But the plans of the LORD stand firm forever, the purposes of His heart through all generations- (Ps. 33:10-11). God’s eternal purpose includes sending His Son to die in our place, redeeming us from the curse of sin (1 Peter 1:17-21). The salvation of those who would be found in Christ is a part of God’s unchanging plan (Eph. 1:4-5). God’s unchanging plan included the purpose of His church as ambassadors to our fallen world (Eph. 3:11). Similarly, it was God’s unchanging plan that His followers would live holy lives (2 Tim. 1:9).
On the other hand, there are over 20 passages explicitly teaching that God does change His mind at times (Gen. 6:6-7; Ex. 32:14; Jud. 2:18; 1 Sam. 15:11, 35; 2 Sam. 24:16; 1 Chr. 21:15; Psalm 106:45; Isa. 38:1-6; Jer. 18:7-10; 26:3, 13, 19; 42:10; Joel 2:13-14; Amos 7:3, 6; Jonah 3:4). This brings up the question: when does God change His mind? First, God changes His mind when people appeal to His mercy (Amos 7:1-3). And second, God changes His mind when people intercede for others in prayer (Amos 7:4-6). This reveals to us the power of prayer.
Open theists will agree that prayer can change the mind of God. However, open theists minimize God’s unlimited foreknowledge to what is knowable in the present. Thus, they limit God’s providential hand which is already at work in the situations that will occur in the future. On the other hand, the conservative Arminian will recognize that from eternity past, God has known every prayer which would ever be offered. And from eternity past, He has also known how He would respond to those prayers.
The early church leader, Augustine said, “Just as your memory does not force the past to have happened, God’s foreknowledge does not force the future to happen. And just as you remember some things that you have done but did not do everything that you remember, God foreknows everything that He causes but does not cause everything that He foreknows. “Let us rather confess that nothing in the future is hidden from God’s foreknowledge, and that no sin is left unpunished by His justice, for sin is committed by the will (free-will), not coerced by God’s foreknowledge.” 
Another issue open theists use to support their view of God’s limited knowledge relates to the problem of evil and suffering. Open theist Gregory Boyd stated, “Maybe God doesn’t know everything because of all the evil in the world. Why doesn’t God use His power to prevent 9/11 or other evils of the world? God knows everything that is knowable, but the future is not knowable therefore God doesn’t know the future perfectly therefore He is not always in a position to stop it.”
However, as we have already discussed, the Bible clearly affirms God’s perfect omniscience. Yet God does not need to eliminate evil, or even balance good and evil, right and wrong in this life, as long as He has promised to justly deal with evil in the next life (2 Thess. 1:5-10). Likewise, God’s perfect foreknowledge of all events which will ever take place does not change what we are going to do, violating our freewill. Rather, it just means that He can plan based upon what we are going to do. In fact, nothing in God’s divine foreknowledge contradicts the existence of human freewill.
Just as your memory does not force the past to have happened, God’s foreknowledge does not force the future to happen. And just as we remember some things that we have done, we do not remember everything that happens to us. On the other hand, God foreknows everything that He causes but does not cause everything that He foreknows.
William Lane Craig said, “How does the addition or deletion of the factor of God’s simply knowing some act in advance affect the freedom of the act? [The claim that it does] posits a constraint on human freedom which is entirely unintelligible. Therefore, it must be false. Somewhere there is a fallacy in the argument, and we need only examine it carefully to find the error” (Only Wise God, pgs. 68-69).
Therefore, as we have seen, open theism is a heresy that is a result of taking Arminianism beyond its intent. It undermines God’s sovereignty, omnipotence, and omniscience. However, thankfully, a careful examination reveals the beauty and majesty of the God of the Bible.
In His service,
Matt

No comments:

Post a Comment