Wednesday, July 24, 2019

Theology 201 #8: The Dangers of Arminianism Part #2


But by the grace of God I am what I am, and His grace to me was not without effect. No, I worked harder than all of them--yet not I, but the grace of God that was with me” (1 Cor. 15:10).
This month we conclude our study of Calvinism and Arminianism. If you will recall: Calvinism and Arminianism are two systems of theology that attempt to explain the relationship between God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility in the matter of salvation. So over the past several months we have considered both sides. Overall, we at Eugene Christian Church feel that the Arminian side has more Scriptural support than the Calvinist side of this debate. However, there are issues with both sides.
Calvinists will argue that Arminians undermine God’s sovereignty. Yet as we have already discussed, in reality Arminianism actually looks to God’s greater sovereignty as He is able to orchestrate His plan for human history without undermining mankind’s freewill.
Calvinists will also argue that Arminianism leads to a works based salvation. To that I have two responses. First, allow Scripture in its totality to determine what a work is and what it is not. Thus, as has already been discussed, from Scripture Arminianism is not a works based salvation. Second, from personal experience, I have not seen mature Arminians who think and act as if their salvation is dependent upon their own good works. Thus, the core doctrine of salvation by grace through faith alone is adhered to by the majority of practicing Arminians.
Apart from objections to Arminianism like the above or other objections that simply look at disagreements in the 5 key teachings of each (see http://eugenechristianchurch.blogspot.com/2018/05/theology-201-3-pick-brighter-tulip-part.html), most other objections can be easily eliminated. However, as an Arminian, I see two that are genuinely worth considering.
The first of which we looked at last month, open theism. No doubt open theism is a dangerous doctrine that arose when Arminianism was taken to an extreme. Open theism undermines God’s all-knowing nature. However, the Bible clearly affirms that God does know all things that have ever happened and will ever happen calling the end from the beginning (Isa. 46:10). Thus, open theism is in fact a dangerous heresy.
A second concern with Arminianism is the misunderstanding of the connection to Pelagianism. Pelagianism derives its name from Pelagius who lived in the 5th century A.D. and was a teacher in Rome, though he was British by birth. Before going into much depth of what Pelagianism teachings, as an Arminian, I do not reject all that he taught.
Pelagius denied Calvinism’s teaching of original sin. Original sin is the teaching that all people have inherited a sin nature from Adam and Eve, and are thus, sinners by birth. Therefore, original sin essentially teaches that people will be held accountable for not only their own sins but also for the sins of their parents (Adam and Eve). However, we have talked extensively about how the Bible clearly teaches that a person cannot be held responsible for someone else’s sins! On our blog, you will find several articles affirming this (see http://eugenechristian church.blogspot.com/2016/07/man-image-of-god-7-do-all-babies-go-to.html?m=0).
  Likewise, Pelagius taught that people were inherently good, similar to Adam and Eve. Ecclesiastes 7:29 affirms that. There Solomon stated, “This only have I found: God made mankind upright, but men have gone in search of many schemes.” However, unfortunately, eventually every person makes the same decision that Adam and Eve made; they make the freewill choice to sin (Rom. 3:23).
All Arminians hold to some variation of this. The majority of Arminians teach what is sometimes referred to as semi-Pelagianism. “This view says that the only hereditary spiritual effect of Adam’s sin is a state of partial depravity. Every baby is born partially depraved, having a soul that is corrupted with spiritual sickness or weakness, i.e., with a ‘bent’ or inclination toward sinning. Still, it is not a total depravity; freewill is not lost. Also, as in the previous view, a child is born innocent, and thus free from guilt and condemnation” (Jack Cottrell, The Faith Once for All, p. 180). This can be witnessed in children at a very early age as they argue with others concerning whose toys they are playing with. “MINE!” Thus, one does not need to teach a child how to be selfish, they inherently act that way. However, as discussed, this does not undermine original grace, and points to how each child goes their own way very early on. “As it is written: "There is no one righteous, not even one” (Rom. 3:10).
This brings us to an issue that Pelagius taught. Pelagius denied that our own sin corrupts our nature. The Bible makes very clear that when a person sins, sin/Satan becomes their master. In Ephesians 2:1-3, the Apostle Paul said, “As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins, in which you used to live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient. All of us also lived among them at one time, gratifying the cravings of our sinful nature and following its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature objects of wrath.”
This brings us to something else that Pelagius undermined, the grace of God. Pelagius taught that grace picked up where our efforts and goodness ended. In other words, Pelagius thought of grace as secondary or supplemental. There could be nothing further from the truth. Grace is necessary throughout all of life and it is not a supplement. It is the only thing that we have.
The Apostle Paul went on in Ephesians 2 to say, “But because of His great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions--it is by grace you have been saved. And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with Him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus, in order that in the coming ages He might show the incomparable riches of His grace, expressed in His kindness to us in Christ Jesus. For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith--and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God--not by works, so that no one can boast” (Eph. 2:4-9). 
Grace is not just something that we need for salvation. Some in actual practice have taught that grace is necessary for a person to be saved initially, yet they are kept in a saving relationship with Jesus Christ by obedience. That is a works based salvation, and it is not possible. Just try to prevent yourself from sinning and see how that goes. Now please do not misunderstand me, the Bible clearly teaches that we should strive to live holy, God honoring lives (Heb. 12:14; 1 Peter 1:16). Yet in actual practice, it is impossible to keep oneself from sinning from time to time. Thus, there is a continual need for God’s grace.
One writer speaking of the dangers of Pelagius’s view of grace said, “All this implies, of course, that if you are extremely talented and self-disciplined and highly-motivated, you may not need grace at all. In other words, Pelagius’ concept of divine grace, at least potentially, makes the death and resurrection of Christ unnecessary” -(Sam Storms, 10 Things You Should Know about Pelagius and Pelagianism).
Additionally, most times that the word grace appears in the Bible, it is not referring to saving grace. Most times it is referring to God’s kindness and love as displayed in His willingness to help us and answer our prayers. That is grace that we need daily as well.  
The bottom line is that we all need God’s grace. No one is going to get into heaven by simply being “a good person.” NO! Every person who makes it to heaven will be there on account of nothing other than God’s amazing grace!
Have you received His grace? And are you living in His grace each and every day? I pray that you are!
In His service,
Matt

Tuesday, July 2, 2019

Theology 201 #7: The Dangers of Arminianism Part #1 Open Theism


Before the mountains were born Or You gave birth to the earth and the world, Even from everlasting to everlasting, You are God” (Ps. 90:2 NASB).
Over the past several months we have compared and contrasted Calvinism and Arminianism. If you will recall: Calvinism and Arminianism are two systems of theology that attempt to explain the relationship between God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility in the matter of salvation. This month we will consider a potential danger related to the Arminian view known as open theism.
Open theism began being taught within the past 20 years or so, and thankfully has very few adherents. It is a liberal view that resulted from taking certain Arminian teachings beyond what is commonly taught. One writer explained open theism in the following way. “Open Theism is the thesis that, because God loves us and desires that we freely choose to reciprocate His love, He has made His knowledge of, and plans for, the future conditional upon our actions. Though omniscient (all-knowing), God does not know what we will freely do in the future. Though omnipotent (all-powerful), He has chosen to invite us to freely collaborate with Him in governing and developing His creation, thereby also allowing us the freedom to thwart His hopes for us. God desires that each of us freely enter into a loving and dynamic personal relationship with Him, and He has therefore left it open to us to choose for or against His will” (https://www. iep.utm.edu/o-theism/).
There are a few things mentioned above that need careful consideration. First, let us consider possible proof texts that open theists use to support their position of God’s omniscience being limited. The open theists will argue, if God’s omniscience is not limited then how does one explain passages that stated that God repented? “And it repented the LORD that He had made man on the earth, and it grieved Him at His heart” (Gen. 6:6; see also the KJV of Ex. 32:14; 1 Sam. 15:11, 35; Jon. 3:10). 
Thus, the open theists argue, why would a perfectly all-knowing God need to repent, or even display emotions of surprise (Mark 6:6), or mourning over the death of a friend named Lazarus that God the Son, Jesus would raise from the dead (John 11:35)? Bruce Ware does a good job of explaining what it means when God is said to repent. “...it indicates His real experience, in historically unfolding relationships with people, of changed dispositions or emotions in relation to some changed human situation. Just because God knows in advance that some event will occur, this does not preclude God from experiencing appropriate emotions and expressing appropriate reactions when it actually happens” (God’s Lesser Glory: The Diminished God of Open Theism, p. 91). This is very similar to how we express emotions. For example, when a loved one has a terminal illness, the doctors inform us that our loved one only has a very limited amount of time left. Thus, we know that they are going to be passing from this life soon, so their death is not a surprise to us. However, we still mourn over their passing when it comes. God is exactly like that. He knows all that will ever take place, yet He still displays emotions that are appropriate for each situation when it occurs.
In the case of when God is said to repent, it is important to note that it indicates that God is aware that the situation has changed. And therefore, He desires to act in a way fitting to this change.
At this point in this lesson, it would be good to consider things about God which never change, and things that do. God's character never changes. He is all-powerful. He is always present everywhere. He knows everything. He is Sovereign—thus, always in charge. He is always holy, righteous, just, loving, merciful and faithful. These are the things that are a part of God’s unchanging nature (Mal. 3:6; Heb. 13:8).
Additionally, God’s eternal purpose and plan do not change, despite our contingent responses to them. “The LORD foils the plans of the nations; he thwarts the purposes of the peoples. But the plans of the LORD stand firm forever, the purposes of His heart through all generations- (Ps. 33:10-11). God’s eternal purpose includes sending His Son to die in our place, redeeming us from the curse of sin (1 Peter 1:17-21). The salvation of those who would be found in Christ is a part of God’s unchanging plan (Eph. 1:4-5). God’s unchanging plan included the purpose of His church as ambassadors to our fallen world (Eph. 3:11). Similarly, it was God’s unchanging plan that His followers would live holy lives (2 Tim. 1:9).
On the other hand, there are over 20 passages explicitly teaching that God does change His mind at times (Gen. 6:6-7; Ex. 32:14; Jud. 2:18; 1 Sam. 15:11, 35; 2 Sam. 24:16; 1 Chr. 21:15; Psalm 106:45; Isa. 38:1-6; Jer. 18:7-10; 26:3, 13, 19; 42:10; Joel 2:13-14; Amos 7:3, 6; Jonah 3:4). This brings up the question: when does God change His mind? First, God changes His mind when people appeal to His mercy (Amos 7:1-3). And second, God changes His mind when people intercede for others in prayer (Amos 7:4-6). This reveals to us the power of prayer.
Open theists will agree that prayer can change the mind of God. However, open theists minimize God’s unlimited foreknowledge to what is knowable in the present. Thus, they limit God’s providential hand which is already at work in the situations that will occur in the future. On the other hand, the conservative Arminian will recognize that from eternity past, God has known every prayer which would ever be offered. And from eternity past, He has also known how He would respond to those prayers.
The early church leader, Augustine said, “Just as your memory does not force the past to have happened, God’s foreknowledge does not force the future to happen. And just as you remember some things that you have done but did not do everything that you remember, God foreknows everything that He causes but does not cause everything that He foreknows. “Let us rather confess that nothing in the future is hidden from God’s foreknowledge, and that no sin is left unpunished by His justice, for sin is committed by the will (free-will), not coerced by God’s foreknowledge.” 
Another issue open theists use to support their view of God’s limited knowledge relates to the problem of evil and suffering. Open theist Gregory Boyd stated, “Maybe God doesn’t know everything because of all the evil in the world. Why doesn’t God use His power to prevent 9/11 or other evils of the world? God knows everything that is knowable, but the future is not knowable therefore God doesn’t know the future perfectly therefore He is not always in a position to stop it.”
However, as we have already discussed, the Bible clearly affirms God’s perfect omniscience. Yet God does not need to eliminate evil, or even balance good and evil, right and wrong in this life, as long as He has promised to justly deal with evil in the next life (2 Thess. 1:5-10). Likewise, God’s perfect foreknowledge of all events which will ever take place does not change what we are going to do, violating our freewill. Rather, it just means that He can plan based upon what we are going to do. In fact, nothing in God’s divine foreknowledge contradicts the existence of human freewill.
Just as your memory does not force the past to have happened, God’s foreknowledge does not force the future to happen. And just as we remember some things that we have done, we do not remember everything that happens to us. On the other hand, God foreknows everything that He causes but does not cause everything that He foreknows.
William Lane Craig said, “How does the addition or deletion of the factor of God’s simply knowing some act in advance affect the freedom of the act? [The claim that it does] posits a constraint on human freedom which is entirely unintelligible. Therefore, it must be false. Somewhere there is a fallacy in the argument, and we need only examine it carefully to find the error” (Only Wise God, pgs. 68-69).
Therefore, as we have seen, open theism is a heresy that is a result of taking Arminianism beyond its intent. It undermines God’s sovereignty, omnipotence, and omniscience. However, thankfully, a careful examination reveals the beauty and majesty of the God of the Bible.
In His service,
Matt

Elder’s Corner: Have You Been To The Well Lately?


“Well I spent some time this morning drinking water from the well. It tasted so refreshing and as far as I can tell. It will satisfy my thirst until I come to drink again, And dip my bucket in the well of wisdom for all men.”
These were the words from a song that the group “God's Messengers” sang back when I was growing up (so you know it was a long time ago!) The words relate to the idea that there is wisdom to be found in the Word of God and that we should “drink often” from it. In fact, I just came in from watering my new trees that I planted a couple of weeks ago. Most were in need of a good watering. One of them had leaves that had curled up and turned brown. It occurred to me that I hadn't given it a drink since I had set it out. I don't think it will survive. I think that could also be true of the Christian who doesn't refresh himself often on the nutrients found in scripture.
Listen to some of the refreshment mentioned from Proverbs chapter 3. “How blessed is the man who finds wisdom. And the man who gains understanding. For her profit is better than the profit of silver, And her gain better than fine gold. She is more precious than jewels; And nothing you desire compares with her. Long life is in her right hand; In her left hand are riches and honor. Her ways are pleasant ways, And all her paths are peace. She is a tree of life to those who take hold of her. And happy are all who hold her fast. The Lord by wisdom founded the earth, By understanding He established the heavens. By His knowledge the deeps were broken up, And the skies drip with dew.”
These words contain the truth that God is the author of wisdom. He wants us to come and fill ourselves up with the gems found in His love letter to us. He knows if we do we will live abundant lives because we will start to reflect His wisdom to others. If we don't “drink up,” I'm afraid we will be like that tree with curled up leaves, so GO TO THE WELL!   
—Alan