Wednesday, May 1, 2019

Theology 201 #6: The Dangers of Calvinism


See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ” (Col. 2:8).
For the first 13 years of my life, I lived on a property that had two small private ponds. While neither of those ponds had much for fish in them, they both had lots of frogs. As a kid I can remember going out there with my older sister and some of her friends and catching frogs. Those frogs were large enough to enjoy frog-legs, not a bad thing. And at the time, my older sister had to try the experiments that she was being taught in school, including how you can literally boil a frog to death by placing it in pot of warm water then ever so gently increasing the temperature. So yes, I can verify as an eye-witness that it really does work on frogs; and sadly the principle works on people as well. No I am not talking about literally boiling a person to death. Rather, there are things that can cause a person to die physically, and more important, spiritually die without them even realizing the danger that they are in. That can be the case with Calvinism, and it is the case for many others in our area who do not understand the danger that they are in. 
Therefore, this month I’d like us to consider three very dangerous aspects of Calvinism to help protect us and those we love from its snares. The first danger of Calvinism is that it teaches people to rely upon the traditions of men rather than adhering strictly to what the Word of God has to say. While I am positive that if you were to ask, the most Calvinists, they will claim that Scripture is there only ruling authority, but in actual practice it can be something totally different. For example, many Calvinists will also point to the significance of their Creeds that they adhere to. Yes, some of the Creeds are simply a summary of essential elements to Biblical Christianity. However, at times, they are not clear on their beliefs. For example, within the Apostles Creed the belief in the Holy Spirit fails to clarify whether the Holy Spirit is one of the Trinity or merely an impersonal divine force. Additionally, creeds can leave out essential elements of Biblical Christianity. Finally, Jesus never gave any authority to written creeds; He only gave His authority in His Word. Watchman Nee wrote: “For man to consider the creeds as authoritative is for him to annul the authority of the Bible! It causes man to take the creeds as the standard instead of taking the Bible as the standard! (The Collected Works of Watchman Nee, vol. 5: The Christian (3), p. 448.)
True, not all Calvinists adhere to creeds, yet there is no way for a person to come to the conclusion that Calvinists do concerning several passages of Scripture without seeing Scripture through the teaching  of church leaders down through the centuries. For example, 1 John 2:2 states that Jesus “is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.” Yet Calvinists teach that world only refers to the elect (those whom God chose for salvation according to Calvinists). To assert that world in 1 John 2:2 refers merely to the elect does not come from the clear reading of Scripture. Likewise, Hebrews 2:9 plainly states that Jesus “tasted death for everyone.” Yet once again, since the Calvinist holds to limited atonement (that Jesus died only for the elect), then the “everyone” which is mentioned in this passage must only be referring to the elect. Thus again, they must hold to a teaching of man above Scripture. This same argument could be made for all five points of Calvinism (see the various articles concerning the five points of Calvinism for proof to this point http://eugenechristian church.blogspot.com/search/label/Theology%20201?updated-max=2018-11-23T13:49:00-08:00&max-results=20&start=5&by-date=false). 
Conversely, Paul as he instructed his comrade, Timothy, stated hands down that the Bible is the authoritative means for Christians to live by (2 Tim. 3:16-17). Additionally, Paul went so far as saying that anyone who perverts the Gospel of Christ are eternally condemned (Gal. 1:6-9). Moses and Solomon back Paul’s warning of adding to or subtracting from the word of God. Indeed, John closed the last words of the Bible with the same exhortation, declaring: “I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book. And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book” (Rev. 22:18-19). Finally, Jesus Himself, made it clear that the Bible was in a class of its own, exalted above all tradition. He rebuked the Pharisees for not accepting the Bible alone and negating the final authority of the Word of God by their religious traditions, saying, “And why do you break the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition?…You nullify the word of God, for the sake of your tradition” (Matt. 15:3, 6). The Bible alone can hardly be stated more emphatically. And unfortunately, Calvinism does not adhere to the Bible alone as their ultimate ruling authority.
Kevin Thompson explains the issue related to the Calvinist’s Gospel in the following way. “In Calvinism, the Biblical Gospel, that is, the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ, is not ‘good news’ for most people. Christ didn’t die for most people in Calvinism, so therefore, it’s not good news for them at all. In fact, it’s completely inconsequential whatsoever to most people. What makes Christ’s death and resurrection consequential to someone? Why it’s simple. It matters if they’re one of the elect. If they’ve been chosen. What this means is that it’s not actually the death or the resurrection of Christ that matters at all. The only thing that matters is one’s election. If you’re elect, you’re good. If not, too bad. At the end of the day, the death and resurrection of Christ is just peripheral as far as anyone is concerned. Only their election matters.
Are you a sinner? Sure. Do you have a remedy for your sin? Well, that depends on whether you’re elect or not. So in Calvinism, the Biblical Gospel isn’t good news at all because you have no idea whether or not Christ died for you to begin with. The only good news for the individual is if they find out that they are one of the elect. You can’t trust in Christ’s blood if it wasn’t shed for you. The only thing left to trust is in your election; the idea that you were chosen.
Can you get saved by trusting your election rather than trusting Christ? No you can’t. So are those trusting something other than Christ saved? You might think so, but I wouldn’t bet on it” (Are Calvinists Saved?). Thus, we see a second fundamental doctrine of Biblical Christianity being rejected in Calvinism.
One final issue that we want to briefly draw our attention to concerning Calvinism is that which is a natural byproduct of unconditional election and perseverance of the saints. To illustrate this point, I am reminded of a woman that I met several years ago. She was a Calvinist who found great peace in thinking that her children who had been raised in the church yet had strayed far from living as the Bible teaches were in fact saved. So while she was saddened by their poor choice of lifestyle, she found comfort in believing that one day they were going to be in heaven in spite of their ungodly lifestyles. No doubt it is easy to sympathize with that woman, but, it doesn’t change what Scripture has to say.
The Bible teaches that “without holiness, no one will see the Lord” (Heb. 12:14). The Bible also teaches that those who continually practice sin are of the devil (1 John 3:8). Therefore, this woman’s hopes for her children were misdirected through the false teaching of Calvinism.
In conclusion, Calvinists do not adhere to the Bible alone as their ultimate ruling authority, nor do they believe that one is saved by trusting Christ alone, and their teaching can lead to false assurance of one’s salvation. So the moral of the story is this, do not be misled “through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ” (Col. 2:8).
In His service,
Matt

No comments:

Post a Comment